Horton

Re: Instrument checkpoint sync calls

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-12-15T14:53:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> patch I submit.  Doesn't seem worth going through the trouble of committing
> that minor rework on its own, I'll slip it into the next useful thing that
> touches this area I do.  Thanks for the hint, this would work better than
> what I did.

Well, if I'm the one committing it, I'll pull that part out again and
commit it separately.  Not sure if that affects your calculus, but I
much prefer patches that don't try to do ancillary things along the
way.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company