Re: Indent authentication overloading

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-11-18T18:47:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 19:41, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>
>>> I thought the proposal on the table was to add "peer" (or some other
>>> name) to refer to the unix-socket auth method, and use that term
>>> preferentially in the docs, while continuing to accept "ident" as an
>>> old name for it.  Is that really too confusing?
>
> What about the pg_ident file?  Are we going to rename it?  Are we

We should've done that long ago - it's already used for things that
aren't ident. If anything, it should be pg_usermap.conf.

> (better) going to have separate files for pg_peer and pg_ident?

Why? It already supports multiple maps...


-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/