Re: Synchronous replication
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-08-02T11:06:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > Let's not get *the manner of specifying the policy* confused with *the > need to update the policy when the master changes*. It doesn't seem > likely you would want the same value for synchronous_standbys on all > your machines. In the most common configuration, you'd probably have: > > on A: synchronous_standbys=B > on B: synchronous_standbys=A Oh, true. But, what if we have another synchronous standby called C? We specify the policy as follows?: on A: synchronous_standbys=B,C on B: synchronous_standbys=A,C on C: synchronous_standbys=A,B We would need to change the setting on both A and B when we want to change the name of the third standby from C to D, for example. No? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center