Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-01-05T13:24:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow Win32 to compile under MinGW. Major changes are:
- 12c942383296 7.4.1 cited
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 04:24, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 17:23, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >>>>> On the other hand, the REPLICATION privilege is denying you the right to >>>>> perform an operation *even though you already are authenticated as a >>>>> superuser*. I don't think there's anywhere else in the system where >>>>> we allow a privilege to non-super-users but deny that same privilege >>>>> to super-users, and I don't think we should be starting now. >>>> >>>> You might want to reflect on rolcatupdate a bit before asserting that >>>> there are no cases where privileges are ever denied to superusers. >>> >>> Oh, huh. I wasn't aware of that. >>> >>>> However, that precedent would suggest that the default should be to >>>> grant the replication bit to superusers. >>> >>> Yes it would. >> >> Just to be clear: are we saying that "CREATE ROLE foo SUPERUSER" >> should grant both superuser and replication, as well as the default >> "postgres" user also having replication as well? > > I think that's what we're saying. Ok, done and applied. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/