Re: Count backend self-sync calls
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-11-15T01:31:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> It might be even better to mention that the reason why we couldn't >> forward the fsync request is that the fsync request queue is full. >> I'm not sure exactly how to phrase that. I thought about: > >> fsync request queue is full > >> But that seems not to answer the "so what" question. There is an >> example like this in the docs: > >> could not forward fsync request (fsync request queue is full) > >> ...but I'm not sure I like that. > > Well, that example is meant to cover cases where you have to assemble a > couple of independently created phrases. In this case I'd suggest > could not forward fsync request because request queue is full Sounds good to me. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company