Re: ExecutorCheckPerms() hook

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> As for committing it, I would definitely like to commit the actual
>> hook.  If we want the hook without the contrib module that's OK with
>> me, although I generally feel it's useful to have examples of how
>> hooks can be used, which is why I took the time to produce a working
>> example.
>
> +1 on committing the hook.  As for the contrib module, it doesn't strike
> me that there's much of a use-case for it as is.  I think it's enough
> that it's available in the -hackers archives.

OK, done that way.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company