Re: Explicit psqlrc

gabrielle <gorthx@gmail.com>

From: gabrielle <gorthx@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Mark Wong <markwkm@gmail.com>, David Christensen <david@endpoint.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-06-23T13:17:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, that might be a good idea, too, but my expectation is that:
>
> psql -f one -f two -f three
>
> ought to behave in a manner fairly similar to:
>
> cat one two three > all
> psql -f all
>
> and it sounds like with this patch that's far from being the case.

Correct.  Each is handled individually.

Should I continue to check on ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK results, or bounce
this back to the author?

gabrielle