Re: Explicit psqlrc
gabrielle <gorthx@gmail.com>
From: gabrielle <gorthx@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Mark Wong <markwkm@gmail.com>, David Christensen <david@endpoint.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-06-23T13:17:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, that might be a good idea, too, but my expectation is that: > > psql -f one -f two -f three > > ought to behave in a manner fairly similar to: > > cat one two three > all > psql -f all > > and it sounds like with this patch that's far from being the case. Correct. Each is handled individually. Should I continue to check on ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK results, or bounce this back to the author? gabrielle