Re: trailing whitespace in psql table output
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-09-28T16:23:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 2:09 PM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote: >>> I must be missing something pretty crucial here as far as the >>> complexity of changing all the regression tests. Wouldn't trimming >>> all trailing whitespace do the trick? > >> Sure. But everyone using pg_regress will have to update their >> regression test expected outputs. > > I'm inclined to think that that's not a fatal objection; it's not like > we haven't felt free to change psql's output format before. As long as > we don't back-patch this change, it should be no worse than other things > we've done to third-party code without a backwards glance. > > It would be good to get rid of this whitespace because (I believe) it is > one of very few reasons for needing to have any trailing whitespace in > git-controlled files. If we could get to a point where trailing > whitespace in patches could be rejected automatically, it'd eliminate > one small pet peeve. I have to agree that would be nice. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company