Re: texteq/byteaeq: avoid detoast [REVIEW]
Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>
From: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>, Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-01-18T08:06:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 05:39, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I haven't looked at this patch, but it seems to me that it would be > reasonable to conclude A != B if the va_extsize values in the toast > pointers don't agree. It's a very light-weight alternative of memcmp the byte data, but there is still the same issue -- we might have different compressed results if we use different algorithm for TOASTing. So, it would be better to apply the present patch as-is. We can improve the comparison logic over the patch in another development cycle if possible. -- Itagaki Takahiro