Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-01-23T02:52:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >>> Oh, you're complaining about SetConfigOption, not the assign hooks. > >> I was actually complaining about the latter, and then switched gears >> to the former. I'm an equal-opportunity complainer today, I guess... > > It does strike me that we could provide SetConfigOptionInt, > SetConfigOptionBool, and SetConfigOptionReal for the benefit of callers > who'd prefer to pass values in those formats. They'd still do sprintf > internally, but this would make the call sites a bit cleaner. Why do we need to double the conversion in the first place? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company