Re: Review: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle
Kevin Grittner <grimkg@gmail.com>
From: Kevin Grittner <grimkg@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
Date: 2010-09-18T18:44:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- serializable_row_locks-v2.patch (text/x-diff) patch v2
This patch suffered a lot of bitrot in the last month, mostly due to the noop patch for SSI. It also used the term SERIALIZABLE in many places to indicate any transaction-snapshot mode transaction, so I applied changes consistent with the noop patch. I also found a few whitespace and brace usage issues which seemed to conflict with conventional usage and cleaned those up. A minor spelling typo also corrected. A new patch reflecting all this is attached. This now compiles and passes regression tests. I still need to re-run all the other tests which Florian and I previously used to test the patch. I don't have any reason to expect that they will now fail, but one need to be thorough. Once that is confirmed, I think this will be ready for committer unless someone can think of something else to throw at it first. -Kevin