Re: SSI bug?
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: Dan Ports <drkp@csail.mit.edu>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-03-25T19:23:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Simplify list traversal logic in add_path().
- a2eb9e0c08ee 9.1.0 cited
-
Update docs about new role privileges reference, per Alvaro.
- ede45e90dd19 9.1.0 cited
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Dan Ports <drkp@csail.mit.edu> wrote: > >> I am surprised to see that error message without SSI's hint about >> increasing max_predicate_locks_per_xact. > > After reviewing this, I think something along the following lines > might be needed, for a start. I'm not sure the Asserts are actually > needed; they basically are checking that the current behavior of > hash_search doesn't change. > > I'm still looking at whether it's sane to try to issue a warning > when an HTAB exceeds the number of entries declared as its max_size > when it was created. I don't see much advantage in changing these to asserts - in a debug build, that will promote ERROR to PANIC; whereas in a production build, they'll cause a random failure somewhere downstream. The HASH_ENTER to HASH_ENTER_NULL changes look like they might be needed, though. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company