Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-08-06T20:50:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2010/8/6 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>: > On fre, 2010-08-06 at 21:31 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> It must not be a function. Just I missing any tool that helps with >> complex structured data. This proposed kind functions has one >> advantage - there isn't necessary any change in parser. Yes, I can use >> a pair of arrays, I can use a one array with seq name, value, I can >> use a custom parser. But nothing from these offers a comfort or >> readability for example a Perl's hash tables. > > Maybe you should just use PL/XSLT. :-) > :)