Re: git diff --patience
Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>
From: Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-09-30T20:23:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- diff_without_patience.patch (application/octet-stream) patch
- diff_with_patience.patch (application/octet-stream) patch
Attached are two versions of the same patch, with and without --patience.
The with-patience version has only two hunks, removal of a big block of
comment and addition of a big block of code.
The without-patience patience is riddled with the mix of two hunks, spread
until line 120.
--patience is a clear winner here.
Regards,
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov
> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> > Do you have an existing commit where you see a difference so I can
> > try it and see if there is some other problem that my local
> > configuration has?
>
> Random poking around in the postgresql.git commits didn't turn up
> any where it mattered, so here's before and after files for the
> example diff files already posted. If you create branch, commit the
> before copy, and copy in the after copy, you should be able to
> replicate the results I posted.
>
> -Kevin
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
>
--
gurjeet.singh
@ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company
http://www.EnterpriseDB.com
singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | yahoo }.com
Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet
Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device