Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/9/16 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Yet there are other cases that probably *could* work well based on a
>>> storage-level abstraction boundary; index-organized tables for instance.
>>> So I think we need to have some realistic idea of what we want to
>>> support and design an API accordingly, not hope that if we don't
>>> know what we want we will somehow manage to pick an API that makes
>>> all things possible.
>>
>> Agreed.  Random ideas: index-organized tables...
>
> I'd love to see a table that is based on one of the existing KVSs.

I'm not familiar with the term KVS?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company