Re: deadlock_timeout at < PGC_SIGHUP?

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is it worth thinking about having an explicit setting for deadlock
> priority?  That'd be more work, of course, and I'm not sure it it's
> worth it, but it'd also provide stronger guarantees than you can get
> with this proposal.

Priority makes better sense, I think.

That's what we're trying to control after all.

But you would need to change the way the deadlock detector works...

-- 
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services