Re: Bug in pg_describe_object, patch v2

Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com>

From: Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com>

To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>

Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>, Herrera Alvaro <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2011-01-23T21:24:43Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Add pg_describe_object function
- 6cc2deb86e91 9.1.0 cited

2011/1/23 Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>>   But anyway, this patch has now officially
>> been discussed to death.
>
> +1 :)

+∞ :)

In the aftermath, I realized I was almost about to feel a bit ashamed
about the fact my original forum post probably gave birth to the most
long lived discussion in the history of PostgreSQL. Having realized
this, I realized a secondly even more important fact, namely the
importance of details, making the whole difference between a sloppy
software project and a highly successful project with the ambition of
achieving perfection in every little detail. I'm proud we can conclude
ProstgreSQL is apparently a project of the second category.

-- 
Best regards,

Joel Jacobson
Glue Finance