Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index
Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>
From: Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, r t <pgsql@xzilla.net>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, Steve Singer <ssinger@ca.afilias.info>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg@sympatico.ca>
Date: 2011-01-26T13:01:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> writes:
> > Attached is the updated patch with doc changes and test cases.
>
> Applied with assorted corrections. Aside from the refactoring I wanted,
> there were various oversights.
>
Looking at the commit, the committed patch resembles the submitted patch by
only about 20% :) .
I agree there were quite serious oversights. Thanks for taking care of
those.
Regards,
--
gurjeet.singh
@ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company
http://www.EnterpriseDB.com
singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | yahoo }.com
Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet
Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device