Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files)
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-11-22T14:53:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> However, I am not clear what benefit we get from moving this into core >> in 9.1. If it's still going to require a full postmaster restart, the >> GUC you have to change may as well be shared_preload_libraries as a >> new one. > > +1. I am not in favor of randomly repackaging functionality, unless > there's some clear benefit gained by doing so. In this case it seems > like something that could and should remain at arm's length forever, > so a contrib module is the ideal packaging. Now, if we could make this so low-overhead that it doesn't need a switch, that would be a good argument for moving it into core, at least to my way of thinking. But if it's something that needs to be enabled with a postmaster restart anyway, meh. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company