Thread

1. wal_sender_delay and WaitLatchOrSocket

   Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> — 2010-09-14T13:02:24Z

   Hi,
   
   In 9.1dev, wal_sender_delay in *milliseconds* is given
   to WaitLatchOrSocket as *microseconds* timeout. This is
   obviously wrong. The attached patch fixes this problem.
   
   Regards,
   
   -- 
   Fujii Masao
   NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
   NTT Open Source Software Center
   

2. Re: wal_sender_delay and WaitLatchOrSocket

   Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> — 2010-09-14T13:36:30Z

   On 14/09/10 16:02, Fujii Masao wrote:
   > Hi,
   >
   > In 9.1dev, wal_sender_delay in *milliseconds* is given
   > to WaitLatchOrSocket as *microseconds* timeout. This is
   > obviously wrong. The attached patch fixes this problem.
   
   Thanks, fixed.
   
   I was just wondering earlier this morning why walsender process was 
   consuming so much CPU while there was nothing happening. Should've rang 
   the bells..
   
   
   -- 
      Heikki Linnakangas
      EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com