Re: Configuring synchronous replication
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, jd@commandprompt.com, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-09-24T15:29:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> wrote: >> Configuring whether the >> master will retain WAL for a disconnected slave on the slave is >> outright byzantine. > > Again, I can't remember having proposed such a thing. No one has, but I keep hearing we don't need the master to have a list of standbys and a list of properties for each standby... -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company