Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>
From: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>
To: Leonardo Francalanci <m_lists@yahoo.it>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-10-01T01:07:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, Leonardo-san, On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > The wording should be something like "CLUSTER requires transient disk > space equal to about twice the size of the table plus its indexes". Could you merge those discussions into the final patch? Also, please check whether my modification broke your patch. Thank you. -- Itagaki Takahiro