Horton

Re: We need to log aborted autovacuums

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-01-17T01:50:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I agree with you, but if we want it *this* release, on top of all the
> other features we have queued, then I suggest we compromise. If you hold
> out for more feature, you may get less.
>
> Statement timeout = 2 * (100ms + autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay) *
> tablesize/(autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit / vacuum_cost_page_dirty)

I'm inclined to think that would be a very dangerous compromise.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company