Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid)

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

To: Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com>

Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>, Herrera Alvaro <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2011-01-09T00:14:11Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Add pg_describe_object function
- 6cc2deb86e91 9.1.0 cited

On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com> wrote:
> 2011/1/8 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
>> I don't think your analysis is correct.  Each entry in pg_depend
>> represents the fact that one object depends on another object, and an
>> object could easily depend on more than one other object, or be
>> depended upon by more than one other object, or depend on one object
>> and be depended on by another.
>
> What does that have to do with this?

Oops.  I misread your query.  I thought the duplicates were because
you were feeding pg_describe_object the same classoid, objoid,
objsubid pair more than once, but I see now that's not the case (UNION
!= UNION ALL).

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company