Re: getting set up on git (finally)
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Cc: "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-10-09T03:12:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote: > I'm finally trying to get current with the switch to git, following this > wiki page: > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Committing_with_Git > > Specifically, I am trying to do: > ------------ > Dependent Clone per Branch, Pushing and Pulling From a Local Repository > -plus- > Clone Locally, Repoint Origin > ------------ > > In order to set this up, I used the attached recipe. Does that look > reasonable and correct? > > I am hoping that from this point forward I can treat each of those > checked out branches exactly (more-or-less) as I did under cvs -- true? E.g. > > #make some changes > git commit -a > git push Looks fairly sane on a quick once-over. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company