Re: getting set up on git (finally)

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Cc: "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-10-09T03:12:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
> I'm finally trying to get current with the switch to git, following this
> wiki page:
>
>  http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Committing_with_Git
>
> Specifically, I am trying to do:
> ------------
> Dependent Clone per Branch, Pushing and Pulling From a Local Repository
>  -plus-
> Clone Locally, Repoint Origin
> ------------
>
> In order to set this up, I used the attached recipe. Does that look
> reasonable and correct?
>
> I am hoping that from this point forward I can treat each of those
> checked out branches exactly (more-or-less) as I did under cvs -- true? E.g.
>
>  #make some changes
>  git commit -a
>  git push

Looks fairly sane on a quick once-over.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company