Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest)
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-03-05T18:27:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Further refine patch for commenting operator implementation functions.
- 908ab8028640 9.1.0 cited
-
Fix citext's upgrade-from-unpackaged script to set its collation correctly.
- 94be9e3f0ca9 9.1.0 cited
-
Mark operator implementation functions as such in their comments.
- 94133a935414 9.1.0 cited
-
Add KNNGIST support to contrib/btree_gist.
- 8436489c81c2 9.1.0 cited
-
Fix plpython breakage detected on certain Fedora machines on buildfarm.
- 4c966d920fb7 9.1.0 cited
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net> wrote: > On 03/05/2011 08:54 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> >> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Andy Colson<andy@squeakycode.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> Support unlogged tables. The contents of an unlogged table are >>>> WAL-logged; >>> >>> um.. are _not_ WAL-logged? >> >> Uh, yeah. It looks like I fixed that in the version I committed, but >> introduced another, similar mistake which I have now also fixed. >> > > Improved support for parallel make, make -k, and make -q > > Can we add a line saying "-j still doesnt work, dont use it yet" or "make > -j2 works great now". I admit I've never tried to use -j before... is this > telling me its ok to use now? I've been using -j3 for a long time. These changes just make it able to parallelize a bit better. As Peter says, -j without arguments is mostly just a footgun. I can't imagine why that option hasn't been removed long since. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company