Re: strncmp->memcmp when we know the shorter length
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-12-21T23:24:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > When the caller knows the smaller string length, memcmp and strncmp are > functionally equivalent. Since memcmp need not watch each byte for a NULL > terminator, it often compares a CPU word at a time for better performance. The > attached patch changes use of strncmp to memcmp where we have the length of the > shorter string. I was most interested in the varlena.c instances, but I tried > to find all applicable call sites. To benchmark it, I used the attached > "bench-texteq.sql". This patch improved my 5-run average timing of the SELECT > from 65.8s to 56.9s, a 13% improvement. I can't think of a case where the > change should be pessimal. This is a good idea. I will check this over and commit it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company