Re: Error code for "terminating connection due to conflict with recovery"
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-01-14T13:20:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> wrote: >> Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> writes: >>>> Please add this to the currently open CommitFest: >>>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open >> >>> Done. Comments are welcome. Unless there's objection, I will commit it >>> this weekend. >> >> If you're expecting anyone to actually *review* it during the CF, >> that's a bit premature. > > No problem to wait for longer. I will wait by the end of January for > the present. Review: The only possible point of concern I see here is the naming of the C identifier. Everything else in class 40 uses ERRCODE_T_R_whatever, with T_R standing for transaction rollback. It's not obvious to me that that convention has any real value, but perhaps we ought to follow it here for the sake of consistency? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company