Re: pg_upgrade version checking questions
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>,
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
"pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
Tomasz Szypowski <tomasz.szypowski@gmail.com>
Date: 2019-07-30T15:13:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> On 27 Jul 2019, at 08:42, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I have committed 0002, 0003, and 0004. Thanks! > The implementation in 0001 (Only allow upgrades by the same exact > version new bindir) has a problem. It compares (new_cluster.bin_version > != PG_VERSION_NUM), but new_cluster.bin_version is actually just the > version of pg_ctl, so this is just comparing the version of pg_upgrade > with the version of pg_ctl, which is not wrong, but doesn't really > achieve the full goal of having all binaries match. Right, it seemed the cleanest option at the time more or less based on the issues outlined below. > I think a better structure would be to add a version check for each > validate_exec() so that each program is checked against pg_upgrade. > This should mirror what find_other_exec() in src/common/exec.c does. In > a better world we would use find_other_exec() directly, but then we > can't support -B. Maybe expand find_other_exec() to support this, or > make a private copy for pg_upgrade to support this. (Also, we have two > copies of validate_exec() around. Maybe this could all be unified.) I’ll take a stab at tidying all of this up to require less duplication, we’ll see where that ends up. cheers ./daniel
Commits
-
pg_upgrade: Check version of target cluster binaries
- f06b1c598254 14.0 landed
-
pg_upgrade: Default new bindir to pg_upgrade location
- 959f6d6a1821 13.0 landed
-
pg_upgrade: Check all used executables
- 0befb4f31386 13.0 landed