Re: Refactoring backend fork+exec code
Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Avoid 0-length memcpy to NULL with EXEC_BACKEND
- 95219c020c3c 17.0 landed
- f3412a61f3f9 18.0 landed
-
Tighten check for --forkchild argument when spawning child process
- 1906b1e0ad96 17.0 landed
- a06e8f84a1ac 18.0 landed
-
Add missing PGDLLIMPORT markings
- 768ceeeaa127 17.0 cited
-
Remove assertions that some compiler say are tautological
- d63d486d6c39 17.0 landed
-
Move code for backend startup to separate file
- 05c3980e7f47 17.0 landed
-
Refactor postmaster child process launching
- aafc05de1bf5 17.0 landed
-
Move some functions from postmaster.c to a new source file
- f1baed18bc3d 17.0 landed
-
Split registration of Win32 deadchild callback to separate function
- 14cddee9cce3 17.0 landed
-
Improve log messages referring to background worker processes
- a3f349c61292 17.0 landed
-
Move initialization of the Port struct to the child process
- 4945e4ed4a72 17.0 landed
-
Pass CAC as an argument to the backend process
- d162c3a73bf1 17.0 landed
-
Set socket options in child process after forking
- 73f7fb2a4c44 17.0 landed
-
Fix references to renamed function in comments
- ef4cfdce0ef8 17.0 landed
-
Use MyBackendType in more places to check what process this is
- 393b5599e517 17.0 landed
-
Remove MyAuxProcType, use MyBackendType instead
- 067701f57758 17.0 landed
-
Replace BackendIds with 0-based ProcNumbers
- 024c52111757 17.0 landed
-
Redefine backend ID to be an index into the proc array
- ab355e3a88de 17.0 landed
-
Remove superfluous 'pgprocno' field from PGPROC
- 28f3915b73f7 17.0 landed
-
Fix incorrect comment on how BackendStatusArray is indexed
- 28215a32b515 14.11 landed
- 90ccc9bf90a9 15.6 landed
- 4cf9ef670e4c 16.2 landed
- 2b53a462cff0 17.0 landed
-
Refactor how InitProcess is called
- fd5e8b440dfd 17.0 landed
-
Pass BackgroundWorker entry in the parameter file in EXEC_BACKEND mode
- 388491f1e5e6 17.0 landed
-
Refactor CreateSharedMemoryAndSemaphores
- 69d903367cde 17.0 landed
-
Silence Valgrind complaint with EXEC_BACKEND
- b19890d49d12 17.0 landed
-
Adjust obsolete comment explaining set_stack_base().
- cf84755575d1 16.2 landed
- 3b51265ee307 17.0 landed
-
Print lwlock stats also for aux processes, when built with LWLOCK_STATS
- f93133a250c6 17.0 landed
-
Move canAcceptConnections check from ProcessStartupPacket to caller.
- 16671ba6e717 17.0 landed
-
Fix crash on syslogger startup
- 5da0a622e889 17.0 landed
-
Refactor ListenSocket array.
- e29c46439511 17.0 landed
-
Use FD_CLOEXEC on ListenSockets
- b0bea38705b2 17.0 landed
-
Don't leak descriptors into subprograms.
- 1da569ca1f1f 16.0 cited
-
Use WaitEventSet API for postmaster's event loop.
- 7389aad63666 16.0 cited
-
Rearrange postmaster's startup sequence for better syslogger results.
- 9a86f03b4e8c 13.0 cited
-
Fix and enhance the assertion of no palloc's in a critical section.
- 1c6821be31f9 9.5.0 cited
On Fri Dec 1, 2023 at 2:44 PM CST, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 01/12/2023 16:00, Alexander Lakhin wrote: > > Maybe you could look at issues with running `make check` under Valgrind > > when server built with CPPFLAGS="-DUSE_VALGRIND -DEXEC_BACKEND": > > # +++ regress check in src/test/regress +++ > > # initializing database system by copying initdb template > > # postmaster failed, examine ".../src/test/regress/log/postmaster.log" for the reason > > Bail out!make[1]: *** > > > > ... > > 2023-12-01 16:48:39.136 MSK postmaster[1307988] LOG: listening on Unix socket "/tmp/pg_regress-pPFNk0/.s.PGSQL.55312" > > ==00:00:00:01.692 1259396== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s) > > ==00:00:00:01.692 1259396== at 0x5245A37: write (write.c:26) > > ==00:00:00:01.692 1259396== by 0x51BBF6C: _IO_file_write@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (fileops.c:1180) > > ==00:00:00:01.692 1259396== by 0x51BC84F: new_do_write (fileops.c:448) > > ==00:00:00:01.692 1259396== by 0x51BC84F: _IO_new_file_xsputn (fileops.c:1254) > > ==00:00:00:01.692 1259396== by 0x51BC84F: _IO_file_xsputn@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (fileops.c:1196) > > ==00:00:00:01.692 1259396== by 0x51B1056: fwrite (iofwrite.c:39) > > ==00:00:00:01.692 1259396== by 0x552E21: internal_forkexec (postmaster.c:4518) > > ==00:00:00:01.692 1259396== by 0x5546A1: postmaster_forkexec (postmaster.c:4444) > > ==00:00:00:01.692 1259396== by 0x55471C: StartChildProcess (postmaster.c:5275) > > ==00:00:00:01.692 1259396== by 0x557B61: PostmasterMain (postmaster.c:1454) > > ==00:00:00:01.692 1259396== by 0x472136: main (main.c:198) > > ==00:00:00:01.692 1259396== Address 0x1ffeffdc11 is on thread 1's stack > > ==00:00:00:01.692 1259396== in frame #4, created by internal_forkexec (postmaster.c:4482) > > ==00:00:00:01.692 1259396== > > > > With memset(param, 0, sizeof(*param)); added at the beginning of > > save_backend_variables(), server starts successfully, but then > > `make check` fails with other Valgrind error. > > That's actually a pre-existing issue, I'm seeing that even on unpatched > 'master'. > > In a nutshell, the problem is that the uninitialized padding bytes in > BackendParameters are written to the file. When we read the file back, > we don't access the padding bytes, so that's harmless. But Valgrind > doesn't know that. > > On Windows, the file is created with > CreateFileMapping(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, ...) and we write the variables > directly to the mapping. If I understand the Windows API docs correctly, > it is guaranteed to be initialized to zeros, so we don't have this > problem on Windows, only on other platforms with EXEC_BACKEND. I think > it makes sense to clear the memory on other platforms too, since that's > what we do on Windows. > > Committed a fix with memset(). I'm not sure what our policy with > backpatching this kind of issues is. This goes back to all supported > versions, but given the lack of complaints, I chose to not backpatch. Seems like a harmless think to backpatch. It is conceivable that someone might want to run Valgrind on something other than HEAD. -- Tristan Partin Neon (https://neon.tech)