Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc?
Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>
From: "Tristan Partin" <tristan@neon.tech>
To: "Andres Freund" <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, "Thomas Munro" <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
"Justin Pryzby" <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Date: 2023-08-08T15:45:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue Aug 8, 2023 at 10:38 AM CDT, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2023-08-08 10:25:52 -0500, Tristan Partin wrote: > > On Mon Aug 7, 2023 at 9:15 PM CDT, Andres Freund wrote: > > > FWIW: with the patches applied, the "credit costs" in cirrus CI are roughly > > > like the following (depends on caching etc): > > > > > > task costs in credits > > > linux-sanity: 0.01 > > > linux-compiler-warnings: 0.05 > > > linux-meson: 0.07 > > > freebsd : 0.08 > > > linux-autoconf: 0.09 > > > windows : 0.18 > > > macos : 0.28 > > > total task runtime is 40.8 > > > cost in credits is 0.76, monthly credits of 50 allow approx 66.10 runs/month > > > > I am not in the loop on the autotools vs meson stuff. How much longer do we > > anticipate keeping autotools around? > > I think it depends in what fashion. We've been talking about supporting > building out-of-tree modules with "pgxs" for at least a 5 year support > window. But the replacement isn't yet finished [1], so that clock hasn't yet > started ticking. > > > > Seems like it could be a good opportunity to reduce some CI usage if > > autotools were finally dropped, but I know there are still outstanding tasks > > to complete. > > > > Back of the napkin math says autotools is about 12% of the credit cost, > > though I haven't looked to see if linux-meson and linux-autotools are 1:1. > > The autoconf task is actually doing quite useful stuff right now, leaving the > use of configure aside, as it builds with address sanitizer. Without that it'd > be a lot faster. But we'd loose, imo quite important, coverage. The tests > would run a bit faster with meson, but it'd be overall a difference on the > margins. > > [1] https://github.com/anarazel/postgres/tree/meson-pkgconfig Makes sense. Please let me know if I can help you out in anyway for the v17 development cycle besides what we have already talked about. -- Tristan Partin Neon (https://neon.tech)
Commits
-
Use snprintf instead of sprintf in pg_regress.
- 8f0fd47fa337 17.0 landed
-
Speed up pg_regress server readiness testing.
- 66d6086cbcbf 17.0 landed
-
ci: Make compute resources for CI configurable
- e4693c68a497 15.5 landed
- e8a8cd05d4b9 16.0 landed
- a28166df8c5a 17.0 landed
-
ci: Prepare to make compute resources for CI configurable
- 284465e1b95e 15.5 landed
- 9ed46c78a362 16.0 landed
- 19cc96503d23 17.0 landed
-
ci: Use VMs for SanityCheck and CompilerWarnings
- 4fdfd0629d77 15.5 landed
- f518c909ead1 16.0 landed
- b2c91d841f1f 17.0 landed
-
ci: Move execution method of tasks into yaml templates
- 462f4df0a86d 15.5 landed
- cad461b044b5 16.0 landed
- 119ee6ab1b00 17.0 landed
-
ci: Don't specify amount of memory
- 89daa5ae307a 15.5 landed
- 5581a9a39530 16.0 landed
- 794e14e219c7 17.0 landed
-
ci: macos: Remove use of -Dsegsize_blocks=6
- 2243ef8dd6fb 16.0 landed
- 3d8d217450a6 17.0 landed
-
ci: macos: Remove use of -DRANDOMIZE_ALLOCATED_MEMORY
- 4bec616f26f5 16.0 landed
- 17ebbdf7de19 17.0 landed