Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management
David Wheeler <david@kineticode.com>
From: "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-12-07T18:39:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Dec 7, 2009, at 9:52 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Tallying up the votes on this patch, we have Tom Lane, Andrew Dunstan, >> Josh Drake, and myself arguing against including this in core, and >> Josh Berkus and Itagaki Takahiro arguing for it. Ron Mayer seemed >> somewhat in favor of it in his message on-list but sent a message >> off-list taking the opposite position. Brendan Jurd cast aspersions >> on the human-readability of the text format but didn't explicitly take >> a position on the core issue, > > Please add my vote for YAML, because of the human-unreadability of the > default text format. In fact I'd argue we could rip out the default > text format and replace it with this one. +1 David