Re: jsonpath versus NaN
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-07-11T00:26:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 4:04 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote: > I understand both patches as fixes and propose to backpatch them to 12 > if no objections. Both patches are pushed. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov
Commits
-
Forbid numeric NaN in jsonpath
- f4ae676e3178 12.4 landed
- 89a0b1a7ca0a 13.0 landed
- df646509f371 14.0 landed
-
Improve error reporting for jsonpath .double() method
- 3ec5f6b53dfb 12.4 landed
- b9a04a9bc665 13.0 landed
- 065718116746 14.0 landed
-
Partial implementation of SQL/JSON path language
- 72b6460336e8 12.0 cited