Re: pgsql: Implement pg_wal_replay_wait() stored procedure
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-10-16T20:20:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Revert pg_wal_replay_wait() stored procedure
- 3a7ae6b3d91e 18.0 landed
-
Add 'no_error' argument to pg_wal_replay_wait()
- e546989a269d 18.0 landed
-
Refactor WaitForLSNReplay() to return the result of waiting
- 73da6b8d1b3e 18.0 landed
-
Make WaitForLSNReplay() issue FATAL on postmaster death
- 6cfebfe88b9a 18.0 landed
-
Move LSN waiting declarations and definitions to better place
- 5035172e4ab5 18.0 landed
-
Update oid for pg_wal_replay_wait() procedure
- e658038772f5 18.0 landed
-
Move pg_wal_replay_wait() to xlogfuncs.c
- 014f9f34d252 18.0 landed
-
Implement pg_wal_replay_wait() stored procedure
- 3c5db1d6b016 18.0 cited
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:35 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote: > On 02.09.24 01:55, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 2:28 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 10:35:27PM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > >>> This path hasn't changes since the patch revision when it was a > >>> utility command. I agree that this doesn't look like proper path for > >>> stored procedure. But I don't think src/backend/utils/adt is > >>> appropriate path either, because it's not really about data type. > >>> pg_wal_replay_wait() looks a good neighbor for > >>> pg_wal_replay_pause()/pg_wal_replay_resume() and other WAL-related > >>> functions. So, what about moving it to src/backend/access/transam? > >> > >> Moving the new function to xlogfuncs.c while publishing > >> WaitForLSNReplay() makes sense to me. > > > > Thank you for proposal. I like this. > > > > Could you, please, check the attached patch? > > We still have stuff in src/backend/commands/waitlsn.c that is nothing > like a "command". You have moved some stuff elsewhere, but what are you > planning to do with the rest? Thank you for spotting this another time. What about moving that somewhere like src/backend/access/transam/xlogwait.c ? ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov Supabase