Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
Date: 2013-03-04T05:16:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Teach SP-GiST to do index-only scans.
- 922036249340 9.2.0 cited
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 03/04/2013 01:42 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > > > This patch only adds one more operator to already committed new > > opclass. Tests already cover this case. Without patch corresponding > > test leads to sequential scan instead of index scan. However, I can't > > see any documentation changes about already committed opclass. I think > > we need a documentation update as an separate patch. > > Jeff changes only does comments changes and renaming, I don't need to > > examine them more. > > OK. Would it be fair to summarize that as "I think it's ready to commit > as-is" ? Do you have any outstanding concerns or uncertainties? Yes. I think it's ready to commit as-is. ------ With best regards, Alexander Korotkov.