Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree

Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
Date: 2013-03-04T05:16:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Teach SP-GiST to do index-only scans.

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> On 03/04/2013 01:42 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> >
> > This patch only adds one more operator to already committed new
> > opclass. Tests already cover this case. Without patch corresponding
> > test leads to sequential scan instead of index scan. However, I can't
> > see any documentation changes about already committed opclass. I think
> > we need a documentation update as an separate patch.
> > Jeff changes only does comments changes and renaming, I don't need to
> > examine them more.
>
> OK. Would it be fair to summarize that as "I think it's ready to commit
> as-is" ? Do you have any outstanding concerns or uncertainties?


Yes. I think it's ready to commit as-is.

------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.