Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Make group_similar_or_args() reorder clause list as little as possible
- 775a06d44c04 18.0 landed
-
Allow usage of match_orclause_to_indexcol() for joins
- 627d63419e22 18.0 landed
-
Skip not SOAP-supported indexes while transforming an OR clause into SAOP
- 5bba0546eecb 18.0 landed
-
Remove the wrong assertion from match_orclause_to_indexcol()
- d4d11940df94 18.0 landed
-
Teach bitmap path generation about transforming OR-clauses to SAOP's
- ae4569161a27 18.0 landed
-
Transform OR-clauses to SAOP's during index matching
- d4378c0005e6 18.0 landed
-
Fix the value of or_to_any_transform_limit in postgresql.conf.sample
- 2af75e117478 17.0 landed
-
Transform OR clauses to ANY expression
- 72bd38cc99a1 17.0 landed
-
MergeAttributes code deduplication
- 64444ce071f6 17.0 cited
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
-
Improve estimation of OR clauses using extended statistics.
- 25a9e54d2db3 14.0 cited
-
Teach btree to handle ScalarArrayOpExpr quals natively.
- 9e8da0f75731 9.2.0 cited
-
Revise collation derivation method and expression-tree representation.
- b310b6e31ce5 9.1.0 cited
-
Instead of trying to force WHERE clauses into CNF or DNF normal form,
- 9888192fb773 8.0.0 cited
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 5:06 PM jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
> assume v40 is the latest version.
> in group_similar_or_args
> we can add a bool variable so
>
> bool matched = false;
> foreach(lc, orargs)
> {
> if (match_index_to_operand(nonConstExpr, colnum, index))
> {
> matches[i].indexnum = indexnum;
> matches[i].colnum = colnum;
> matches[i].opno = opno;
> matches[i].inputcollid = clause->inputcollid;
> matched = true;
> break;
> }
> }
> ...
> if (!matched)
> return orargs;
> /* Sort clauses to make similar clauses go together */
> qsort(matches, n, sizeof(OrArgIndexMatch), or_arg_index_match_cmp);
> ....
>
>
> I guess it can save some cycles?
Do you mean we can quit early if no clause matches no index? Sounds
reasonable, will do.
One other thing that I noticed is "if (matches[i].indexnum >= 0)"
check is one level inner than it should be. That will be fixed in the
next revision of patch.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase