Re: Get rid of WALBufMappingLock
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>, Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>, Yura Sokolov <y.sokolov@postgrespro.ru>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Date: 2025-03-02T11:59:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 3:44 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 02:13:23PM +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > > On 2025-Feb-28, Michael Paquier wrote: > >> Saying that, I have also done similar tests with your v12 for a couple > >> of hours and this looks stable under installcheck-world. I can see > >> that you've reworked quite a bit the surroundings of InitializedFrom > >> in this one. If you apply that once again at some point, the > >> buildfarm will be judge in the long-term, but I am rather confident by > >> saying that the situation looks better here, at least. > > > > Heh, no amount of testing can prove lack of bugs; but for sure "it looks > > different now, so it must be correct" must be the weakest proof of > > correctness I've heard of! > > Err, okay. I did use the word "stable" with tests rather than > "correct", and I implied upthread that I did not check the correctness > nor the internals of the patch. If my words held the meaning you > are implying, well, my apologies for the confusion, I guess. I only > tested the patch and it was stable while I've noticed a few diffs with > the previous version, but I did *not* check its internals at all, nor > do I mean that I endorse its logic. I hope that's clear now. Got it. Michael, thank you very much for your help. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov Supabase