Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes

Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
To: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan@nataraj.su>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>, teodor@sigaev.ru, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>, Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>
Date: 2024-11-25T07:08:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Make group_similar_or_args() reorder clause list as little as possible

  2. Allow usage of match_orclause_to_indexcol() for joins

  3. Skip not SOAP-supported indexes while transforming an OR clause into SAOP

  4. Remove the wrong assertion from match_orclause_to_indexcol()

  5. Teach bitmap path generation about transforming OR-clauses to SAOP's

  6. Transform OR-clauses to SAOP's during index matching

  7. Fix the value of or_to_any_transform_limit in postgresql.conf.sample

  8. Transform OR clauses to ANY expression

  9. MergeAttributes code deduplication

  10. SEARCH and CYCLE clauses

  11. Improve estimation of OR clauses using extended statistics.

  12. Teach btree to handle ScalarArrayOpExpr quals natively.

  13. Revise collation derivation method and expression-tree representation.

  14. Instead of trying to force WHERE clauses into CNF or DNF normal form,

Hi, Richard!

On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 8:28 AM Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 3:34 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm going to push this if no objections.
>
> Here is an Assert failure in match_orclause_to_indexcol.
>
> create table t (a int);
> create index on t (a);
>
> # explain select * from t where a <= 0 or a <= 1;
> server closed the connection unexpectedly
>
> The assertion is that the collected Const values cannot be NULL and
> cannot be zero.  The latter part about zero values doesn't make sense
> to me.  Why can't the values be zero?
>
>     Assert(!value->constisnull && value->constvalue);

Yes, this is a dumb assertion.  Removed.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase