Re: point_ops for GiST

Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>

From: Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
To: Stefan Keller <sfkeller@gmail.com>
Cc: Emre Hasegeli <emre@hasegeli.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2015-10-12T09:24:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, Stefan!

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Stefan Keller <sfkeller@gmail.com> wrote:

> Pls. don't misunderstand my questions: They are directed to get an
> even more useful spatial data handling of PostgreSQL. I'm working with
> PostGIS since years and are interested in any work regarding spatial
> types...
>
> Can anyone report use cases or applications of these built-in geometric
> types?
>
> Would'nt it be even more useful to concentrate to PostGIS
> geometry/geography types and extend BRIN to these types?
>

Note, that PostGIS is a different project which is maintained by separate
team. PostGIS have its own priorities, development plan etc.
PostgreSQL have to be self-consistent. In particular, it should have
reference implementation of operator classes which extensions can use as
the pattern. This is why it's important to maintain built-in geometric
types.

In short: once we implement it for built-in geometric types, you can ask
PostGIS team to do the same for their geometry/geography.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix gist_box_same and gist_point_consistent to handle fuzziness correctly.

  2. Add point_ops opclass for GiST.