Horton

Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes

Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>, Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan@nataraj.su>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>, teodor@sigaev.ru, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Date: 2024-10-04T22:31:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Make group_similar_or_args() reorder clause list as little as possible

  2. Allow usage of match_orclause_to_indexcol() for joins

  3. Skip not SOAP-supported indexes while transforming an OR clause into SAOP

  4. Remove the wrong assertion from match_orclause_to_indexcol()

  5. Teach bitmap path generation about transforming OR-clauses to SAOP's

  6. Transform OR-clauses to SAOP's during index matching

  7. Fix the value of or_to_any_transform_limit in postgresql.conf.sample

  8. Transform OR clauses to ANY expression

  9. MergeAttributes code deduplication

  10. SEARCH and CYCLE clauses

  11. Improve estimation of OR clauses using extended statistics.

  12. Teach btree to handle ScalarArrayOpExpr quals natively.

  13. Revise collation derivation method and expression-tree representation.

  14. Instead of trying to force WHERE clauses into CNF or DNF normal form,

On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 9:40 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 2:20 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 2:00 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yes, transformAExprIn() does the work to coerce all the expressions in
> > > the right part to the same type.  Similar logic could be implemented
> > > in match_orclause_to_indexcol().  What worries me is whether it's
> > > quite late stage for this kind of work.  transformAExprIn() works
> > > during parse stage, when we need to to resolve types, operators etc.
> > > And we do that once.
> >
> > I agree that it would be a bit awkward. Especially having spent so
> > much time talking about doing this later on, not during parsing. That
> > doesn't mean that it's necessarily the wrong thing to do, though.
>
> True, but we also can't realistically use select_common_type() here. I
> mean, it thinks that we have a ParseState and that there might be
> values with type UNKNOWNOID floating around. By the time we reach the
> planner, neither thing is true. And honestly, it looks to me like
> that's pointing to a deeper problem with your idea. When someone
> writes foo IN (1, 2222222222222222222222222), we have to make up our
> mind what type of literal each of those is. select_common_type()
> allows us to decide that since the second value is big, we're going to
> consider both to be literals of type int8. But that is completely
> different than the situation this patch faces. We're now much further
> down the road; we have already decided that, say, 1, is and int4 and
> 2222222222222222222222222 is an int8. It's possible to cast a value to
> a different type if we don't mind failing or have some principled way
> to avoid doing so, but it's way too late to reverse our previous
> decision about how to parse the characters the user entered. The
> original "char *" value is lost to us and the type OID we picked may
> already be stored in the catalogs or something.

+1

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase