Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
To: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>,
Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>,
Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>,
"a.rybakina" <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2024-01-15T07:56:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Restore preprocess_groupclause()
- 505c008ca37c 17.0 landed
-
Rename PathKeyInfo to GroupByOrdering
- 0c1af2c35c7b 17.0 landed
-
Add invariants check to get_useful_group_keys_orderings()
- 91143c03d4ca 17.0 landed
-
Fix asymmetry in setting EquivalenceClass.ec_sortref
- 199012a3d844 17.0 landed
-
Multiple revisions to the GROUP BY reordering tests
- 874d817baa16 17.0 landed
-
Get rid of pg_class usage in SJE regression tests
- e1b7fde418f2 17.0 landed
-
Rename index "abc" in aggregates.sql
- b91f91870828 17.0 landed
-
Explore alternative orderings of group-by pathkeys during optimization.
- 0452b461bc40 17.0 landed
-
Generalize the common code of adding sort before processing of grouping
- 7ab80ac1caf9 17.0 landed
-
Fix out-dated comment in preprocess_groupclause()
- f6c70b81802a 15.0 landed
- 78a9af1a2764 16.0 landed
-
Force parallelism in partition_aggregate
- 2fe6b2a806f2 16.0 landed
- 01474f56981a 15.0 landed
-
Optimize order of GROUP BY keys
- db0d67db2401 15.0 landed
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 8:42 AM Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 8:20 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Thank you for providing the test case relevant for this code change. >> The revised patch incorporating this change is attached. Now the >> patchset looks good to me. I'm going to push it if there are no >> objections. > > Seems I'm late for the party. Can we hold for several more days? I'd > like to have a review on this patch. Sure, NP. I'll hold it till your review. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov