Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Hi, Alvaro! Thank you for your care on this matter. On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 9:15 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > BTW I noticed that > https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/commands/waitlsn.c.gcov.html > says that lsn_cmp is not covered by the tests. This probably indicates > that the tests are a little too light, but I'm not sure how much extra > effort we want to spend. I'm aware of this. Ivan promised to send a patch to improve the test. If he doesn't, I'll care about it. > I'm still concerned that WaitLSNCleanup is only called in ProcKill. > Does this mean that if a process throws an error while waiting, it'll > not get cleaned up until it exits? Maybe this is not a big deal, but it > seems odd. I've added WaitLSNCleanup() to the AbortTransaction(). Just pushed that together with the improvements upthread. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov
Commits
-
Ensure standby promotion point in 043_wal_replay_wait.pl
- 2520226c953c 18.0 landed
-
Minor cleanup related to pg_wal_replay_wait() procedure
- 85b98b8d5a48 18.0 landed
-
Adjust pg_wal_replay_wait() procedure behavior on promoted standby
- 867d396ccd2a 18.0 landed
-
pg_wal_replay_wait(): Fix typo in the doc
- 8036d73ae3d4 18.0 landed
-
Implement pg_wal_replay_wait() stored procedure
- 3c5db1d6b016 18.0 landed
- 06c418e163e9 17.0 landed
-
Revert: Implement pg_wal_replay_wait() stored procedure
- 772faafca1b2 17.0 landed
-
Call WaitLSNCleanup() in AbortTransaction()
- 74eaf66f988c 17.0 landed
-
Clarify what is protected by WaitLSNLock
- ee79928441e7 17.0 landed
-
Use an LWLock instead of a spinlock in waitlsn.c
- 25f42429e2ff 17.0 landed
-
Use the pairing heap instead of a flat array for LSN replay waiters
- bf1e65080629 17.0 landed
-
Minor improvements for waitlsn.c
- e37662f22158 17.0 landed
-
Make the order of the header file includes consistent
- 97d85be36544 17.0 cited