Re: pg_atomic_exchange_u32() in ProcArrayGroupClearXid()
Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
From: Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-09-22T13:28:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 9:55 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:06 PM Alexander Korotkov > <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > While investigating ProcArrayGroupClearXid() code I wonder why do we > have this loop instead of plain pg_atomic_exchange_u32() call? > > We can use pg_atomic_exchange_u32 instead of a loop. In fact, clog > code uses pg_atomic_exchange_u32 for the same purpose. I think it is > better to make the code consistent at both places. Feel free to > change it, otherwise, I can take care of it in a few days time. > Thank you for feedback. Pushed. ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
Commits
-
Replace CAS loop with single TAS in ProcArrayGroupClearXid()
- 2f39106a209e 12.0 landed