Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>,
vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>,
Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>,
"a.rybakina" <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2024-01-11T11:30:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Restore preprocess_groupclause()
- 505c008ca37c 17.0 landed
-
Rename PathKeyInfo to GroupByOrdering
- 0c1af2c35c7b 17.0 landed
-
Add invariants check to get_useful_group_keys_orderings()
- 91143c03d4ca 17.0 landed
-
Fix asymmetry in setting EquivalenceClass.ec_sortref
- 199012a3d844 17.0 landed
-
Multiple revisions to the GROUP BY reordering tests
- 874d817baa16 17.0 landed
-
Get rid of pg_class usage in SJE regression tests
- e1b7fde418f2 17.0 landed
-
Rename index "abc" in aggregates.sql
- b91f91870828 17.0 landed
-
Explore alternative orderings of group-by pathkeys during optimization.
- 0452b461bc40 17.0 landed
-
Generalize the common code of adding sort before processing of grouping
- 7ab80ac1caf9 17.0 landed
-
Fix out-dated comment in preprocess_groupclause()
- f6c70b81802a 15.0 landed
- 78a9af1a2764 16.0 landed
-
Force parallelism in partition_aggregate
- 2fe6b2a806f2 16.0 landed
- 01474f56981a 15.0 landed
-
Optimize order of GROUP BY keys
- db0d67db2401 15.0 landed
Attachments
- 0001-Generalize-common-code-of-adding-sort-befor-20240111.patch (application/octet-stream) patch 0001
- 0002-Explore-alternative-orderings-of-group-by-p-20240111.patch (application/octet-stream) patch 0002
Hi! On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 1:14 PM Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hmm, I don't see this old code in these patches. Resend 0002-* because >> of trailing spaces. > > > AFAIK, cfbot does not seek old versions of patchset parts in previous messages. So for it to run correctly, a new version of the whole patchset should be sent even if most patches are unchanged. Please, find the revised patchset with some refactoring and comments improvement from me. I'll continue looking into this. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov