Re: Removing unneeded self joins
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Remove GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE from enable_self_join_elimination
- 717d0e8dd945 18.0 landed
-
Put enable_self_join_elimination into postgresql.conf.sample
- c2d329260cd8 18.0 landed
-
Get rid of ojrelid local variable in remove_rel_from_query()
- e167191dc146 18.0 landed
-
Implement Self-Join Elimination
- fc069a3a6319 18.0 cited
-
Revert: Remove useless self-joins
- d1d286d83c0e 17.0 landed
-
Replace lateral references to removed rels in subqueries
- 466979ef031a 17.0 landed
-
Replace relids in lateral subquery parse tree during SJE
- 489072ab7a9e 17.0 landed
-
Forbid SJE with result relation
- 8c441c082797 17.0 landed
-
Fix misuse of RelOptInfo.unique_for_rels cache by SJE
- 30b4955a4668 17.0 landed
-
Replace the relid in some missing fields during SJE
- a7928a57b9f0 17.0 landed
-
Revert 56-bit relfilenode change and follow-up commits.
- a448e49bcbe4 16.0 cited
-
Stabilize timetz test across DST transitions.
- 4a071afbd056 14.0 cited
-
Speed up finding EquivalenceClasses for a given set of rels
- 3373c7155350 13.0 cited
-
Fix mark-and-restore-skipping test case to not be a self-join.
- 24d08f3c0a1f 12.0 landed
Attachments
- v3-0001-Disallow-removing-placeholders-during-Self-Join-E.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v3-0001
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 11:04 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 12:02 AM Alena Rybakina > <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > Should we add more regression tests covering these cases? > > > > I experimented with some examples like this and noticed that it does affect cardinality estimation, though I'm not sure the impact is significant. > > I used the tables from the regression tests, so if they’re appropriate for reproducing this case, it should be straightforward to add them. > > Thank you for your feedback. I've check the cases you've provided. I > found that the differences here are related to the SJE itself, not to > changes regarding PHVs handling. I think it generally OK that > estimates are somewhat changed due to such significant query > transformation. Hopefully they should be improved in the majority of > cases. > > I did some improvements to PHVs patch: revised comments and commit > message. I'm going to push it if no objections. Uh, v2 was there already. That should be v3. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov Supabase