Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<aekorotkov@gmail.com>wrote:

> Described differences leads to incorrect behaviour of GiST index.
> The question is: what is correct way to fix it? Should on_pb also use FP*
> or consistent method should behave like on_pb?
>

Any comments on this? Current behaviour definitely indicates a bug, and I'm
ready to fix it. The only question: is this bug in on_pb or gist?

------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.