Re: Unmatched test and comment in partition_join.sql regression test
Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>
From: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-12-16T08:19:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 7:17 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote: > I noticed this in the regression test while polishing the PWJ-enhancement patch: > > -- partitionwise join can not be applied for a join between list and range > -- partitioned tables > EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) > SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_n t1 FULL JOIN prt1 t2 ON (t1.c = t2.c); > > The test doesn't match the comment which precedes it, because both > tables are range-partitioned as shown below. > I think the test should be moved to a more appropriate place, On second thought I changed my mind; we would not need to move that test, so I refrained from doing so. > Attached is a patch for that. The > patch fixes another misplaced comment as well. I pushed an updated version of the patch. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
Commits
-
Clean up some misplaced comments in partition_join.sql regression test.
- 06b9f38d35d1 11.7 landed
- e3ac8939324d 12.2 landed
- 956ef5875341 13.0 landed