Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join
Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>
From: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>
To: amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>,
Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-07-30T07:57:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Suppress unused-variable warning.
- 401418ca6a68 13.0 landed
-
Allow partitionwise joins in more cases.
- c8434d64ce03 13.0 landed
-
Avoid crash in partitionwise join planning under GEQO.
- 7ad6498fd5a6 12.0 cited
- d70c147fa217 11.3 cited
-
Disable support for partitionwise joins in problematic cases.
- 7cfdc77023ad 12.0 cited
-
Add plan_cache_mode setting
- f7cb2842bf47 12.0 cited
-
Add test for partitionwise join involving default partition.
- 4513d3a4be0b 12.0 cited
-
Revise API for partition_rbound_cmp/partition_rbound_datum_cmp.
- b0229235564f 11.0 landed
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:09 PM amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 5:03 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote: >> I started reviewing this. Here is my initial review comments: >> >> * 0001-Hash-partition-bound-equality-refactoring-v22.patch >> However, I don't think it's a good idea to do this >> refactoring, because that would lead to duplicating the code to check >> whether two given hash bound collections are equal in >> partition_bounds_equal() and partition_hash_bounds_merge() that will >> be added by the main patch, after all. To avoid that, how about >> calling partition_bounds_equal() from partition_hash_bounds_merge() in >> the main patch, like the attached? > Agree, your changes look good to me, thanks for working on it. Cool! Thanks for reviewing! Sorry for the delay. I was busy with something else recently. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita