Re: warning to publication created and wal_level is not set to logical

> Agreed, fixed.  Also run through pgindent
>

Thank you for the adjustments.


> I agree that it's not really worth having tests for this, and I take
> your point about the dependency on wal_level that we don't currently
> have.  The problem is that the core tests include publications
> already, and it doesn't seem like a great idea to move the whole lot
> to a TAP test.  Creating alternative expected files seems like a bad
> idea too (annoying to maintain, wouldn't compose well with the next
> thing like this).  So... how about we just suppress WARNINGs for
> CREATE PUBLICATION commands that are expected to succeed?  Like in the
> attached.  This version passes installcheck with any wal_level.
>
All right, for me. If wal_level can not interfere with the testes result,
it seems to a better approach

*Lucas Viecelli*


<http://www.leosoft.com.br/coopcred>