Re: Minmax indexes
Nicolas Barbier <nicolas.barbier@gmail.com>
From: Nicolas Barbier <nicolas.barbier@gmail.com>
To: obartunov@gmail.com
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>,
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>,
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>,
Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2014-08-07T18:04:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2014-08-07 Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>: > +1 for BRIN ! +1, rolls off the tongue smoothly and captures the essence :-). Nicolas -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad?
Commits
-
Refactor per-page logic common to all redo routines to a new function.
- f8f4227976a2 9.5.0 cited
-
Reduce use of heavyweight locking inside hash AM.
- 76837c1507cb 9.3.0 cited
-
Scan the buffer pool just once, not once per fork, during relation drop.
- ece01aae4792 9.2.0 cited
-
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov>
- 9e2a87b62db8 7.1.1 cited