Re: Minmax indexes

Nicolas Barbier <nicolas.barbier@gmail.com>

From: Nicolas Barbier <nicolas.barbier@gmail.com>
To: obartunov@gmail.com
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2014-08-07T18:04:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2014-08-07 Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>:

> +1 for BRIN !

+1, rolls off the tongue smoothly and captures the essence :-).

Nicolas

-- 
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?


Commits

  1. Refactor per-page logic common to all redo routines to a new function.

  2. Reduce use of heavyweight locking inside hash AM.

  3. Scan the buffer pool just once, not once per fork, during relation drop.

  4. Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov>